This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Patch to clean up extend.texi
- To: Gerald Pfeifer <pfeifer at dbai dot tuwien dot ac dot at>
- Subject: Re: Patch to clean up extend.texi
- From: "Joseph S. Myers" <jsm28 at cam dot ac dot uk>
- Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2001 22:05:43 +0100 (BST)
- cc: <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
On Tue, 12 Jun 2001, I wrote:
> I didn't touch the option name, nor the names of the built-in functions
> themselves, nor the node name "Other Builtins" (which has links from
> elsewhere in the manual) - just made the spelling be "built-in function"
> consistently following Kenner's recommendation.
[...]
> The Texinfo manual says @samp may sometimes look better for whole
> statements; in case of doubt I'm leaving things as they are.
So, is the patch OK to commit as is?
--
Joseph S. Myers
jsm28@cam.ac.uk