This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: PATCH: new script gcc/doc/install.texi2html
- To: pfeifer at dbai dot tuwien dot ac dot at
- Subject: Re: PATCH: new script gcc/doc/install.texi2html
- From: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
- Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2001 11:22:09 -0700
- Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, jsm28 at cam dot ac dot uk
- Organization: CodeSourcery, LLC
- References: <Pine.BSF.4.33.0106031327110.87397-100000@deneb.dbai.tuwien.ac.at>
>>>>> "Gerald" == Gerald Pfeifer <pfeifer@dbai.tuwien.ac.at> writes:
Gerald> SOURCEDIR=/here/is/checked-out-gcc/doc/
Gerald> DESTDIR=/here/is/the/tree/to/build/the-tarball-from/
Gerald> $SOURCEDIR/install.texi2html
I would prefer to have this become part of the normal build process.
The basic model in the gcc_release script at this point is that you
check out the sources, do a build (which creates additional stuff in
the source directory, like c-parse.c), and then creates tarballs based
on the (updated) source directory.
If the generated HTML files should go in the source tarballs, then the
way to accomplish that is to make running this script part of `make
bootstrap'. That seems pretty sensible to me; we might as well build
all the documentation as part of `make bootstrap'. It doesn't take
long, and it's not like it's very big; the .info files add up to about
30K.
What do you think about that?
--
Mark Mitchell mark@codesourcery.com
CodeSourcery, LLC http://www.codesourcery.com