This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Restore __eprintf
- To: David Edelsohn <dje at watson dot ibm dot com>
- Subject: Re: Restore __eprintf
- From: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at redhat dot com>
- Date: 02 Jun 2001 02:00:29 -0300
- Cc: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Organization: GCC Team, Red Hat
- References: <200106012131.RAA08950@makai.watson.ibm.com>
On Jun 1, 2001, David Edelsohn <dje@watson.ibm.com> wrote:
> Doesn't linking against both the shared library and the static
> library make a significant assumption about the semantics of a system
> link-editor when faced with duplicate symbols in shared and static
> libraries? Is this safe on all systems on which GCC is trying to switch
> to shared libgcc library?
FWIW, I don't know of any evidence to the contrary.
--
Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Developer aoliva@{cygnus.com, redhat.com}
CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist *Please* write to mailing lists, not to me