This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: other/2857: i18n, translations does not work
- To: Philipp Thomas <pthomas at suse dot de>
- Subject: Re: other/2857: i18n, translations does not work
- From: "Joseph S. Myers" <jsm28 at cam dot ac dot uk>
- Date: Fri, 25 May 2001 10:51:12 +0100 (BST)
- cc: Dennis Bjorklund <db at zigo dot dhs dot org>, Zack Weinberg <zackw at Stanford dot EDU>, Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>, <Gabriel dot Dos-Reis at cmla dot ens-cachan dot fr>, <gcc-gnats at gcc dot gnu dot org>, <gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org>, <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
On Fri, 25 May 2001, Philipp Thomas wrote:
> > Question: do the release scripts need to generate the compiled .gmo files?
> > As those are binary, we surely don't want to put them in CVS.
>
> Yes, they would need to do so, according to GNU standards, as the user
> should not need to have the tools to create them.
Since it looks like the Makefiles by default create catalogs in the build
directory, could you make the necessary changes - either to the release
script Mark posted, or to the Makefiles to build them in the source
directory instead - for them to be included in release tarballs?
--
Joseph S. Myers
jsm28@cam.ac.uk