This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: [RFA] Integrated hashtables take 2


>>>>> "Zack" == Zack Weinberg <zackw@Stanford.EDU> writes:
 
    Zack> We want to do this anyway, because it'll save two pointers
    Zack> per structure (as far as I can tell, both TREE_CHAIN and
    Zack> TREE_TYPE are unused for IDENTIFIER_NODEs) and possibly we
    Zack> could cram the few bits of the flag word in somewhere else,
    Zack> saving another four bytes...

See identifier_type_value in cc1plus.

Anyhow, if we want to do this, we should do it first.

    Zack> If we can do that in the near future, then I don't think
    Zack> there's a problem with a temporary layering violation.

Temporary is such a funny word.  :-)

We still have those "fix this before GCC 1.3" comments after all.

--
Mark Mitchell                   mark@codesourcery.com
CodeSourcery, LLC               http://www.codesourcery.com


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]