This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: RFA: non-const libcalls

To: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at redhat dot com>
Subject: Re: RFA: non-const libcalls
From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
Date: Sun, 13 May 2001 21:30:32 -0700
Cc: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, bernds at cygnus dot co dot uk
References: <20010508011338O.mitchell@codesourcery.com> <oroft441le.fsf@guarana.lsd.ic.unicamp.br> <20010508060618H.mitchell@codesourcery.com> <orwv7mlq7i.fsf@guarana.lsd.ic.unicamp.br> <20010512105224.F29134@redhat.com> <or1ypujum3.fsf@guarana.lsd.ic.unicamp.br> <20010512112857.A29214@redhat.com> <ork83kdg0q.fsf@guarana.lsd.ic.unicamp.br>

On Sun, May 13, 2001 at 07:45:57PM -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> Hmm...  So we probably still have a problem with regular function
> calls declared with attribute const, don't we?  We should probably be
> emitting CALL_INSN_FUNCTION_USAGE notes for arguments passed by
> reference to non-libcall const functions, shouldn't we?

Maybe.  It might already be taken care of.  I don't remember.


r~

References:
- Re: RFA: non-const libcalls
  - From: Alexandre Oliva
- Re: RFA: non-const libcalls
  - From: Mark Mitchell
- Re: RFA: non-const libcalls
  - From: Alexandre Oliva
- Re: RFA: non-const libcalls
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: RFA: non-const libcalls
  - From: Alexandre Oliva
- Re: RFA: non-const libcalls
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: RFA: non-const libcalls
  - From: Alexandre Oliva

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]