This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: [PATCH] Handle weak symbols


On 06-May-2001, Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com> wrote:
> >>>>> "Kaveh" == Kaveh R Ghazi <ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu> writes:
> 
>     Kaveh> warns about it with -pedantic.)  Thus we avoid this
>     Kaveh> construct in the stage1 compiled areas.
> 
> So does that mean that we shouldn't use `bool' as a return type in
> those areas?

No.  Using bool as a return type is fine in those areas.

(Note that although Kaveh R Ghazi may have sounded like he was disagreeing
with me, his comment was actually not inconsistent with what I wrote;
it just elaborated more of the details.)

-- 
Fergus Henderson <fjh@cs.mu.oz.au>  |  "I have always known that the pursuit
                                    |  of excellence is a lethal habit"
WWW: <http://www.cs.mu.oz.au/~fjh>  |     -- the last words of T. S. Garp.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]