This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: [PATCH] Handle weak symbols

To: Franz Sirl <Franz dot Sirl-kernel at lauterbach dot com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Handle weak symbols
From: Fergus Henderson <fjh at cs dot mu dot oz dot au>
Date: Mon, 7 May 2001 11:35:27 +1000
Cc: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
References: <01050621252300.16952@enzo.bigblue.local> <20010506142202Q.mitchell@codesourcery.com> <01050702154306.16952@enzo.bigblue.local>

On 07-May-2001, Franz Sirl <Franz.Sirl-kernel@lauterbach.com> wrote:
> On Sunday 06 May 2001 23:22, Mark Mitchell wrote:
> >   - is_on_pending_weak_list:
> >     - Should return `bool'.
> 
> Really? wasn't there just a discussion that we don't want to use bool in this 
> directory?

Only for function parameters.
For function return types `bool' should be fine.

The reason for the difference is that traditional K&R function
declarations specify the return type, but not the parameter types.

-- 
Fergus Henderson <fjh@cs.mu.oz.au>  |  "I have always known that the pursuit
                                    |  of excellence is a lethal habit"
WWW: <http://www.cs.mu.oz.au/~fjh>  |     -- the last words of T. S. Garp.

References:
- [PATCH] Handle weak symbols
  - From: Franz Sirl
- Re: [PATCH] Handle weak symbols
  - From: Mark Mitchell
- Re: [PATCH] Handle weak symbols
  - From: Franz Sirl

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]