This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: C++ PATCH: Diagnose use of abstract class in function prototype

To: gdr at codesourcery dot com
Subject: Re: C++ PATCH: Diagnose use of abstract class in function prototype
From: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2001 13:08:27 -0700
Cc: jason_merrill at redhat dot com, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Organization: CodeSourcery, LLC
References: <m3lmp8lsb1.fsf@prospero.cambridge.redhat.com><20010410115132N.mitchell@codesourcery.com><flitkc1rh2.fsf@sel.cmla.ens-cachan.fr>

>>>>> "Gabriel" == Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr@codesourcery.com> writes:

    Gabriel> That is a rather peculiar characterization of "serious
    Gabriel> error".

The point is that if I am ever to have any hope of actually finishing
this release, the standards must be lower than we might hope ideally.

The key criteria is that GCC 3.0 be better than GCC 2.95 -- not that
it fix all problems, even relatively serious ones.  For G++ in
particular, we want to build a stable base (the new ABI) for future
progress.

--
Mark Mitchell                   mark@codesourcery.com
CodeSourcery, LLC               http://www.codesourcery.com

Follow-Ups:
- Re: C++ PATCH: Diagnose use of abstract class in function prototype
  - From: Gabriel Dos Reis

References:
- Re: C++ PATCH: Diagnose use of abstract class in function prototype
  - From: Jason Merrill
- Re: C++ PATCH: Diagnose use of abstract class in functionprototype
  - From: Mark Mitchell
- Re: C++ PATCH: Diagnose use of abstract class in function prototype
  - From: Gabriel Dos Reis

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]