This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: gcc-2.95.3-diff-010218 for ARM
- To: Larry Doolittle <ldoolitt at recycle dot lbl dot gov>
- Subject: Re: gcc-2.95.3-diff-010218 for ARM
- From: Philip Blundell <philb at gnu dot org>
- Date: Sat, 07 Apr 2001 14:59:52 +0100
- cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- References: <20010406125819.A26614@recycle.lbl.gov>
>Looking at the timestamps on gcc-2.95.3 and the patch,
>lots of work was done on gcc-2.95.3 after the patch was
>created, and the patch really applies to a CVS copy some
>time before 2.95.3 was released. In particular, reload1.c
>was changed in different ways in the patch and the release
>copy. I don't know if the two ways are equivalent, if
>one is better than the other, and if the 2.95.3 version
>is compatible with the other changes in Phil's patch.
I thought that patch had been generated against the final 2.95.3 tarball but
clearly this isn't actually the case. Probably the best thing to do is simply
omit the reload change from the diff -- it isn't related to any of the other
patches, and I think the bug is fixed in 2.95.3 anywya.
p.