This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: C++ PATCH: Throttle inlining
- To: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
- Subject: Re: C++ PATCH: Throttle inlining
- From: law at redhat dot com
- Date: Tue, 03 Apr 2001 22:17:42 -0700
- cc: pfeifer at dbai dot tuwien dot ac dot at, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Reply-To: law at redhat dot com
In message <20010403222308M.mitchell@codesourcery.com>you write:
> >>>>> "law" == law <law@redhat.com> writes:
>
> law> Cool. I'm wondering if this bug is what's been causing
> law> multiple symbol errors on hpux11 on the gcc-3.0 branch. Time
> law> to fire up another build.
>
> Could be -- but only if those popped up in the last week or so. If
> they predate that, or if they persist now, it's likely there's some
> deeper problem.
Given my travel schedule over the last few weeks, I've really got no
clue when they started showing up? :-)
> Do we use COMDAT on HPUX11? I know HP's tools do, so
> the OS supports it, but I'm not sure if GCC knows how to take
> advantage of that support.
Not at the current time. I'm having a bear of a time figuring out
certain aspects of SOM these days. Weak symbols cause the linker to
crash. Something else is causing hp's nm to crash. Fun fun.
Anyway, I'll try to get a spin started remotely so that I can report
back any change in state.
jeff