Re: [PATCH] Re: A clue for the libstdc++ problem.

["Zack Weinberg" <zackw at Stanford dot EDU>]

On Sun, Apr 01, 2001 at 05:18:58PM -0700, H . J . Lu wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 01, 2001 at 08:57:47PM -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> > 
> > I'm tempted to install the patch I have now, just to get things back
> > into a working shape, and then proceed with the discussion about the
> > best way to address it, if anybody still has the energy for it.  If
> > nobody screams in horror ;-) about the patch that introduces
> > CXX_FOR_TARGET_FOR_RECURSIVE_MAKE, I'll check it in in half an hour or
> > so.
> > 
> 
> Can you tell me what is wrong with this patch? As far as I can tell,
> CXXLINK in libstdc++-v3/src/Makefile.am is only used to build
> libstdc++.so.
> 
> 
> H.J.
> ---
> 2001-04-01  H.J. Lu  (hjl@gnu.org)
> 
> 	* libstdc++-v3/src/Makefile.am (CXXLINK): Remove --tag CXX and
> 	replace $(CXX) with $(CC).
> 	* libstdc++-v3/src/Makefile.in: Rebuild.
> 
> --- gcc/libstdc++-v3/src/Makefile.am.libstdc++	Sat Mar 31 21:04:29 2001
> +++ gcc/libstdc++-v3/src/Makefile.am	Sun Apr  1 17:06:34 2001
> @@ -349,5 +349,5 @@ LTCXXCOMPILE = $(LIBTOOL) --tag CXX --mo
>  # course is problematic at this point.  So, we get the top-level
>  # directory to configure libstdc++-v3 to use gcc as the C++
>  # compilation driver.
> -CXXLINK = $(LIBTOOL) --tag CXX --mode=link $(CXX) \
> +CXXLINK = $(LIBTOOL) --mode=link $(CC) \
>  	  @OPT_LDFLAGS@ @SECTION_LDFLAGS@ $(AM_CXXFLAGS) $(LDFLAGS) -o $@
> --- gcc/libstdc++-v3/src/Makefile.in.libstdc++	Sat Mar 31 21:04:29 2001
> +++ gcc/libstdc++-v3/src/Makefile.in	Sun Apr  1 17:07:06 2001
> @@ -333,7 +333,7 @@ LTCXXCOMPILE = $(LIBTOOL) --tag CXX --mo
>  # course is problematic at this point.  So, we get the top-level
>  # directory to configure libstdc++-v3 to use gcc as the C++
>  # compilation driver.
> -CXXLINK = $(LIBTOOL) --tag CXX --mode=link $(CXX) \
> +CXXLINK = $(LIBTOOL) --mode=link $(CC) \
>  	  @OPT_LDFLAGS@ @SECTION_LDFLAGS@ $(AM_CXXFLAGS) $(LDFLAGS) -o $@
>  
>  CONFIG_HEADER = ../config.h