This is the mail archive of the mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: Patch to remove putenv definition from gcc.c

On Fri, 30 Mar 2001 15:45:54 -0800, Zack Weinberg wrote:

>On Fri, Mar 30, 2001 at 04:32:07PM -0700, Gregory L Priem wrote:
>> i appear to currently have access to systems running: V5.5-2, V7.1,
>> and V7.2-1
>Are all of those systems VAXes, or are there some Alphas in the mix too?
>And what version of what system compiler is installed on each?  It will
>be much easier to get GCC building again with DEC C than VAX C, since
>the former is far less buggy, C89-compliant, etc.

The 5.5-2 system is VAX-only, of course. the 7.1 system is VAX
[clustered with 7.1-1H2 Alphas, which i currently cannot access]. the
7.2-1 is VAX and Alpha.

>I'm not sure it is worth even trying to test right now.  I would suggest
>we wait until the ACT people roll their VMS patches back into the
>official tree; that will get Alpha/VMS working again.  Then the VAX
>port can be repaired by taking the Alpha port for an example.

that is what i am currently doing [waiting], since i saw a note
stating that ACT would be bringing in their changes which would help
out on the Alpha. 

greg priem                         kb0erz
bark, fido, bark [neither of us speak for my employer]

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]