This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: [C++ PATCH] Fix implicit assignment operators with anonymous aggregates

To: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>
Subject: Re: [C++ PATCH] Fix implicit assignment operators with anonymous aggregates
From: Jason Merrill <jason at redhat dot com>
Date: 22 Mar 2001 09:17:57 +0000
Cc: mark at codesourcery dot com, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
References: <20010320171848.E1635@sunsite.ms.mff.cuni.cz><u9hf0o49m9.fsf@casey.cambridge.redhat.com><20010321103348.I11594@devserv.devel.redhat.com><u9n1afaytu.fsf@casey.cambridge.redhat.com><20010321113709.J11594@devserv.devel.redhat.com>

>>>>> "Jakub" == Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> writes:

> Should I keep the change in build_modify_expr or use the previous patch
> plus the decl.c bits to disallow ctors, dtors and assign_refs?

The latter.  Sorry about the confusion.

Jason

Follow-Ups:
- [C++ PATCH] Fix implicit assignment operators with anonymous aggregates (take 2)
  - From: Jakub Jelinek

References:
- [C++ PATCH] Fix implicit assignment operators with anonymous aggregates
  - From: Jakub Jelinek
- Re: [C++ PATCH] Fix implicit assignment operators with anonymous aggregates
  - From: Jason Merrill
- Re: [C++ PATCH] Fix implicit assignment operators with anonymous aggregates
  - From: Jakub Jelinek
- Re: [C++ PATCH] Fix implicit assignment operators with anonymous aggregates
  - From: Jason Merrill
- Re: [C++ PATCH] Fix implicit assignment operators with anonymous aggregates
  - From: Jakub Jelinek

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]