This is the mail archive of the mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: java/decl.c patch for clear_binding_level

On Sat, Mar 17, 2001 at 06:09:22PM -0700, Tom Tromey wrote:
> >>>>> "Zack" == Zack Weinberg <> writes:
> Zack> # of unexpected failures        96
> This is still way too high.  The "real" number is around 2.  It
> "should" be 0 -- I went through the test suite a while back and set
> things up so that the number of unexpected failures is 0.

Please keep in mind that I have no other version of gcj/libgcj
installed on my system.  This is deliberate; I want to find bugs 
that crop up when you don't.

For instance, I would still hit the -c -o bug in libtool, if Alexandre
hadn't come up with a patch (which has not been applied).

It may be having other effects.

> Zack> PASS: Thread_Join -O compilation from source
> Zack> libgcj failure: only thread already running
> This means you failed to configure with `--enable-threads=posix'.

I don't tend to supply any --enable switches, again, because I want to
find bugs that crop up when you don't.  If there is a required
--enable option, it should be the default, and contrariwise if it
isn't the default it shouldn't be required.  And not being required
means that the test suite should notice and mark those test cases as

I'll rebuild with --enable-threads=posix, but that will take several


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]