This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: autoconf for type sizes
- To: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at redhat dot com>
- Subject: Re: autoconf for type sizes
- From: Akim Demaille <akim at epita dot fr>
- Date: 13 Mar 2001 12:02:52 +0100
- Cc: "Kaveh R. Ghazi" <ghazi at caip dot rutgers dot edu>, zackw at stanford dot edu, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, rth at redhat dot com
- References: <200103130447.XAA28705@caip.rutgers.edu><orzoeqggnf.fsf@guarana.lsd.ic.unicamp.br>
>>>>> "Alexandre" == Alexandre Oliva <aoliva@redhat.com> writes:
Alexandre> In any case, I suppose it would be worth to borrow CVS
Alexandre> autoconf's _AC_COMPUTE_INT framework, instead of
Alexandre> re-inventing the wheel in GCC.
Is there any good reason not to use CVS Autoconf? I mean, let's
consider we release it now, or RSN. So how about moving to 2.49d,
which I will `release' today, so that we know if we need to change
things for GCC in 2.50.
I fail to understand why people don't want to give a try to 2.49d.
It's only delaying problems. What difference does it make to find a
problem with 2.49d as opposed to 2.50?