This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: x-files must die: rather too much at once


 > From: "Zack Weinberg" <zackw@Stanford.EDU>
 > 
 > On Sat, Mar 10, 2001 at 09:24:03AM -0500, Kaveh R. Ghazi wrote:
 > > 
 > > For the sake of consistency, I'd prefer to keep all system includes
 > > and autoconf hacks in system.h.  So I'm rethinking whether hwint.h
 > > should be included via config.h.  Perhaps it should instead be
 > > included via system.h and we leave limits.h/params.h and the INTTYPE_*
 > > stuff in system.h.  Then include hwint.h right after.  That seems
 > > cleaner IMHO.
 > > 
 > > Thoughts?
 > 
 > I have no particular opinion either way.
 > zw

Then would you please follow my suggestion?
Or if you like I can do that and you can layer your patch on top.

		Thanks,
		--Kaveh

PS: please split that mother. :-)  Mondo patches are hard to grok.

--
Kaveh R. Ghazi			Engagement Manager / Project Services
ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu		Qwest Internet Solutions


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]