This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Fix breakage introduced by Feb 18 patch
- To: Bernd Schmidt <bernds at redhat dot com>
- Subject: Re: Fix breakage introduced by Feb 18 patch
- From: Diego Novillo <dnovillo at redhat dot com>
- Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2001 13:06:41 -0500
- Cc: Richard Kenner <kenner at vlsi1 dot ultra dot nyu dot edu>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Organization: Red Hat Canada
- References: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0103011751050.1311-100000@host140.cambridge.redhat.com>
On Thu, 01 Mar 2001, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
> caused performance regressions on i686-linux. These show up
> when running SPEC95. The fix is rather obvious (bootstrapped
> on i686-linux up to some kind of libstdc++-v3 problem).
>
Yes. I just noticed that. I've also noticed that 134.perl has
been slowly degrading since Nov 2000. I haven't had much time to
look at the patches that caused the regressions, let alone act on
them.
> Diego, do you think we could arrange to publish the nightly
> SPEC results on gcc.gnu.org instead of only internally? Maybe
> if we do that, people will actually look at them on some kind
> of regular basis.
>
I guess we can. I am unaware of any kind of licensing
restrictions regarding the results. I know we can't distribute
the test themselves, but I think the results are fair game. Does
anybody know for sure?
The results include the patches for that day, so it shouldn't be
too hard to see what caused the regression.
If it's OK to publish them, I would need instructions on how to
copy the nightly results to gcc.gnu.org.