This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/950628-1.c execution, -O1


    It'd be a lot less costly if we reverted parts of your Dec 30 changes,
    which make quite a bit more /u slots than otherwise needed.

Some are needed, when the type is actually readonly, but I agree the changes
that add readonly explicitly probably don't gain anything given if we are
forced to not reuse such slots.

However, I still come back to the issue of whether it's worth imposing the
restriction of only one store.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]