This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: Bug in g++ --syntax-only

To: Phil Edwards <pedwards at disaster dot jaj dot com>
Subject: Re: Bug in g++ --syntax-only
From: Jason Merrill <jason at redhat dot com>
Date: 16 Jan 2001 13:35:32 +0000
Cc: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>, Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>, Gcc Bug List <bug-gcc at gnu dot org>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
References: <873deo1hn7.fsf@creche.redhat.com><20010116002459.A32456@disaster.jaj.com><20010115215546.C27073@redhat.com><u9ae8rc33v.fsf@casey.cambridge.redhat.com><20010116052741.A1827@disaster.jaj.com>

>>>>> "Phil" == Phil Edwards <pedwards@disaster.jaj.com> writes:

> On Tue, Jan 16, 2001 at 09:24:36AM +0000, Jason Merrill wrote:

>> No, not OK.  Please fix this in g++spec.c instead (search for 'warning').

> Something like this?

Yes, this is OK, thanks.

> (What's the diference?)

Several: This way fixes the problem where the problem originates, reuses
existing code and results in a smaller change.

Jason

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Bug in g++ --syntax-only
  - From: Phil Edwards

References:
- Re: Bug in g++ --syntax-only
  - From: Phil Edwards
- Re: Bug in g++ --syntax-only
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: Bug in g++ --syntax-only
  - From: Jason Merrill
- Re: Bug in g++ --syntax-only
  - From: Phil Edwards

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]