This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Patch: gcj -vs- largest negative number


According to the JLS, `2147483648' is only valid if it is the argument
of unary `-'.  However, gcj also incorrectly accepts it as the
argument of binary `-'.

This patch fixes that error.

This isn't the prettiest patch.  In fact it is ugly.  I couldn't think
of another way to implement this functionality.

Comments?
Ok to commit?

2000-11-19  Tom Tromey  <tromey@cygnus.com>

	* parse.y (trap_overflow_corner_case): New rule.
	(unary_expression): Use it.
	* lex.c (java_init_lex): Don't set minus_seen.
	(yylex): Don't use minus_seen.  Communicate overflow to parser for
	it to handle.
	(error_if_numeric_overflow): New function.
	* parse.h (minus_seen): Removed field.
	(JAVA_RADIX10_FLAG): New define.

Tom

Index: lex.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/egcs/gcc/java/lex.c,v
retrieving revision 1.55
diff -u -r1.55 lex.c
--- lex.c	2000/12/13 22:47:13	1.55
+++ lex.c	2000/12/14 16:13:18
@@ -62,6 +62,9 @@
 static void java_unget_unicode PARAMS ((void));
 static unicode_t java_sneak_unicode PARAMS ((void));
 java_lexer *java_new_lexer PARAMS ((FILE *, const char *));
+#ifndef JC1_LITE
+static void error_if_numeric_overflow PARAMS ((tree));
+#endif
 
 /* This is nonzero if we have initialized `need_byteswap'.  */
 static int byteswap_init = 0;
@@ -126,7 +129,6 @@
   ctxp->lineno = lineno = 0;
   ctxp->p_line = NULL;
   ctxp->c_line = NULL;
-  ctxp->minus_seen = 0;
   ctxp->java_error_flag = 0;
   ctxp->lexer = java_new_lexer (finput, encoding);
 }
@@ -967,6 +969,7 @@
       int  i;
 #ifndef JC1_LITE
       int  number_beginning = ctxp->c_line->current;
+      tree value;
 #endif
       
       /* We might have a . separator instead of a FP like .[0-9]* */
@@ -1197,9 +1200,8 @@
 	     expressed using a 10 radix. For other radixes, everything that
 	     fits withing 64 bits is OK. */
 	  int hb = (high >> 31);
-	  if (overflow || (hb && low && radix == 10) ||  
-	      (hb && high & 0x7fffffff && radix == 10) ||
-	      (hb && !(high & 0x7fffffff) && !ctxp->minus_seen && radix == 10))
+	  if (overflow || (hb && low && radix == 10)
+	      || (hb && high & 0x7fffffff && radix == 10))
 	    JAVA_INTEGRAL_RANGE_ERROR ("Numeric overflow for `long' literal");
 	}
       else
@@ -1210,19 +1212,21 @@
 	     that fits within 32 bits is OK.  As all literals are
 	     signed, we sign extend here. */
 	  int hb = (low >> 31) & 0x1;
-	  if (overflow || high || (hb && low & 0x7fffffff && radix == 10) ||
-	      (hb && !(low & 0x7fffffff) && !ctxp->minus_seen && radix == 10))
+	  if (overflow || high || (hb && low & 0x7fffffff && radix == 10))
 	    JAVA_INTEGRAL_RANGE_ERROR ("Numeric overflow for `int' literal");
 	  high = -hb;
 	}
-      ctxp->minus_seen = 0;
+#ifndef JC1_LITE
+      value = build_int_2 (low, high);
+      JAVA_RADIX10_FLAG (value) = radix == 10;
+      SET_LVAL_NODE_TYPE (value, long_suffix ? long_type_node : int_type_node);
+#else
       SET_LVAL_NODE_TYPE (build_int_2 (low, high),
-			  (long_suffix ? long_type_node : int_type_node));
+			  long_suffix ? long_type_node : int_type_node);
+#endif
       return INT_LIT_TK;
     }
 
-  ctxp->minus_seen = 0;
-
   /* Character literals */
   if (c == '\'')
     {
@@ -1439,7 +1443,6 @@
 	  BUILD_OPERATOR2 (MINUS_ASSIGN_TK);
 	default:
 	  java_unget_unicode ();
-	  ctxp->minus_seen = 1;
 	  BUILD_OPERATOR (MINUS_TK);
 	}
 
@@ -1612,6 +1615,37 @@
   }
   return 0;
 }
+
+#ifndef JC1_LITE
+/* This is called by the parser to see if an error should be generated
+   due to numeric overflow.  This function only handles the particular
+   case of the largest negative value, and is only called in the case
+   where this value is not preceeded by `-'.  */
+static void
+error_if_numeric_overflow (value)
+     tree value;
+{
+  if (TREE_CODE (value) == INTEGER_CST && JAVA_RADIX10_FLAG (value))
+    {
+      unsigned HOST_WIDE_INT lo, hi;
+
+      lo = TREE_INT_CST_LOW (value);
+      hi = TREE_INT_CST_HIGH (value);
+      if (TREE_TYPE (value) == long_type_node)
+	{
+	  int hb = (hi >> 31);
+	  if (hb && !(hi & 0x7fffffff))
+	    java_lex_error ("Numeric overflow for `long' literal", 0);
+	}
+      else
+	{
+	  int hb = (lo >> 31) & 0x1;
+	  if (hb && !(lo & 0x7fffffff))
+	    java_lex_error ("Numeric overflow for `int' literal", 0);
+	}
+    }
+}
+#endif /* JC1_LITE */
 
 static void
 java_unicode_2_utf8 (unicode)
Index: parse.h
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/egcs/gcc/java/parse.h,v
retrieving revision 1.62
diff -u -r1.62 parse.h
--- parse.h	2000/11/22 05:25:15	1.62
+++ parse.h	2000/12/14 16:13:19
@@ -760,8 +760,6 @@
   /* Indicates that a context already contains saved data and that the
      next save operation will require a new context to be created. */
   unsigned saved_data:1;
-  /* Integral literal overflow */
-  unsigned minus_seen:1;
   /* Report error when true */
   unsigned java_error_flag:1;
   /* @deprecated tag seen */
@@ -922,6 +920,11 @@
 #define SET_CPC_INSTANCE_INITIALIZER_STMT(C,S)			\
   if (CPC_INSTANCE_INITIALIZER_LIST(C))				\
     TREE_PURPOSE (CPC_INSTANCE_INITIALIZER_LIST (C)) = (S);
+
+/* This is used by the lexer to communicate with the parser.  It is
+   set on an integer constant if the radix is 10, so that the parser
+   can correctly diagnose a numeric overflow.  */
+#define JAVA_RADIX10_FLAG(NODE) TREE_LANG_FLAG_0(NODE)
 
 #ifndef JC1_LITE
 void java_complete_class PARAMS ((void));
Index: parse.y
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/egcs/gcc/java/parse.y,v
retrieving revision 1.234
diff -u -r1.234 parse.y
--- parse.y	2000/12/13 22:36:24	1.234
+++ parse.y	2000/12/14 16:13:30
@@ -556,7 +556,7 @@
 			switch_statement synchronized_statement throw_statement
 			try_statement switch_expression switch_block
 			catches catch_clause catch_clause_parameter finally
-			anonymous_class_creation
+			anonymous_class_creation trap_overflow_corner_case
 %type    <node>         return_statement break_statement continue_statement
 
 %type    <operator>     ASSIGN_TK      MULT_ASSIGN_TK  DIV_ASSIGN_TK  
@@ -2275,16 +2275,24 @@
 		{ $$ = build_incdec ($2.token, $2.location, $1, 1); }
 ;
 
-unary_expression:
+trap_overflow_corner_case:
 	pre_increment_expression
 |	pre_decrement_expression
 |	PLUS_TK unary_expression
 		{$$ = build_unaryop ($1.token, $1.location, $2); }
-|	MINUS_TK unary_expression
-		{$$ = build_unaryop ($1.token, $1.location, $2); }
 |	unary_expression_not_plus_minus
 |	PLUS_TK error
 		{yyerror ("Missing term"); RECOVER}
+;
+
+unary_expression:
+	trap_overflow_corner_case
+		{
+		  error_if_numeric_overflow ($1);
+		  $$ = $1;
+		}
+|	MINUS_TK trap_overflow_corner_case
+		{$$ = build_unaryop ($1.token, $1.location, $2); }
 |	MINUS_TK error
 		{yyerror ("Missing term"); RECOVER}
 ;

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]