This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: [IMPORTANT] libgcj/gcc trees integration.

To: apbianco at cygnus dot com
Subject: Re: [IMPORTANT] libgcj/gcc trees integration.
From: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>
Date: 07 Dec 2000 15:26:41 -0700
Cc: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at redhat dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, mark at codesourcery dot com, bkoz at cygnus dot com
References: <200012062133.NAA10917@deliverance.cygnus.com> <ork89drz9y.fsf@guarana.lsd.ic.unicamp.br> <14895.56931.428291.707587@deliverance.cygnus.com>
Reply-To: tromey at redhat dot com

>>>>> "Alex" == Alexandre Petit-Bianco <apbianco@cygnus.com> writes:

Alex> Well, some objected at using zip to build the Java class
Alex> archive. The patches makes us switch to fastjar. But maybe
Alex> you're right, we (the Java team) shouldn't take it up to us to
Alex> get rid of zip.

As long as we don't bring the zip tree into the gcc tree.  RMS
objected to zip because it is not really free software.  I don't know
the precise problem, but it doesn't matter.  We promised to replace
zip with 100% free software (fastjar) before merging trees.

Tom

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [IMPORTANT] libgcj/gcc trees integration.
  - From: Alexandre Petit-Bianco

References:
- [IMPORTANT] libgcj/gcc trees integration.
  - From: Alexandre Petit-Bianco
- Re: [IMPORTANT] libgcj/gcc trees integration.
  - From: Alexandre Oliva
- Re: [IMPORTANT] libgcj/gcc trees integration.
  - From: Alexandre Petit-Bianco

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]