This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: The -m4-nofpu fix didn't work...
- To: Bernd Schmidt <bernds at redhat dot co dot uk>
- Subject: Re: The -m4-nofpu fix didn't work...
- From: Jeffrey A Law <law at cygnus dot com>
- Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2000 09:46:17 -0600
- cc: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at redhat dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, Elena Zannoni <ezannoni at cygnus dot com>
- Reply-To: law at cygnus dot com
In message <Pine.LNX.email@example.com>you
> On 15 Sep 2000, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> > On Sep 15, 2000, Bernd Schmidt <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> > > On 15 Sep 2000, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> > >> On Sep 15, 2000, Bernd Schmidt <email@example.com> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > I'm not sure what the best way to fix this would be
> > >>
> > >> Can't we just have those functions defined unconditionally in
> > >> m2/libgcc, even though they're only going to be used for -m4-nofpu?
> > > We could do that if the assembler won't choke on some m4 opcode.
> Well, the assembler seems pretty happy with this change. OK to install?
> * lib1funcs.ams (movstr_i4 functions): Always compile in.