This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: [G]CSE of extended asm statements

To: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at redhat dot com>
Subject: Re: [G]CSE of extended asm statements
From: Richard Henderson <rth at cygnus dot com>
Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2000 11:07:21 -0700
Cc: Bernd Schmidt <bernds at cygnus dot co dot uk>, Jeffrey A Law <law at cygnus dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
References: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0009010923300.24465-100000@balti.cygnus.co.uk> <or66ogyphk.fsf@guarana.lsd.ic.unicamp.br>

On Fri, Sep 01, 2000 at 02:46:31PM -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> We don't.  expand_asm_operands create a separate ASM_OPERANDS for each
> output operand.  It's just the input and input constraint vectors that
> are shared.  My patch works correctly even if there are multiple
> output operands.

Sure enough.  I guess your patch is ok then.


r~

References:
- Re: [G]CSE of extended asm statements
  - From: Bernd Schmidt
- Re: [G]CSE of extended asm statements
  - From: Alexandre Oliva

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]