This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Problems with exception handling in glibc and gcc.
- To: Jason Merrill <jason at redhat dot com>
- Subject: Re: Problems with exception handling in glibc and gcc.
- From: "H . J . Lu" <hjl at lucon dot org>
- Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2000 09:24:08 -0700
- Cc: Ulrich Drepper <drepper at cygnus dot com>,Geoff Keating <geoffk at cygnus dot com>, kettenis at wins dot uva dot nl,amacleod at cygnus dot com, libc-alpha at sourceware dot cygnus dot com,gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- References: <20000702161814.A31028@lucon.org> <200007030105.SAA00436@localhost.cygnus.com> <u98zvixqxf.fsf@casey.soma.redhat.com> <200007040952.CAA01955@localhost.cygnus.com> <200007041202.OAA20105@landau.wins.uva.nl> <200007042147.OAA02541@localhost.cygnus.com> <20000704173137.A6180@lucon.org> <m3hfa51jkm.fsf@otr.mynet.cygnus.com> <20000705093836.A8552@lucon.org> <u9lmylcy92.fsf@casey.soma.redhat.com>
On Fri, Jul 28, 2000 at 10:16:09PM -0700, Jason Merrill wrote:
> Looks pretty good. But there's no reason to declare the foo_frame
> interfaces in the runtime.h header, since new code shouldn't call
Glibc 2.2 still calls them. Ulrich, I think we should use
HAVE_DWARF2_UNWIND_INFO only in glibc 2.2. The versions of gcc which
can compile glibc 2.2 should support HAVE_DWARF2_UNWIND_INFO.
> them. And I'd prefer a name like "object_buffer" rather than
> "frame_object", to clarify that it isn't a real object.
Done. Mark suggested a special directory for it. I think it is a
good idea.
>
> Alsso, please send all GCC patches to gcc-patches; I don't keep up
> with gcc-bugs.
>
I will send a patch after some test.
Thanks.
H.J.