This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: (i386-linux x sh-elf) build breakage
On Jul 27, 2000, Richard Henderson <rth@cygnus.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 27, 2000 at 07:09:12PM -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
>> What other blatant problems?
> Oh, that's right, we define away inline don't we.
Yep. And, when compiling with GCC, an static inline function isn't
emitted separately unless its address is taken. The point was to make
it a macro that didn't evaluate arguments multiple times. In fact, I
had initially written it as a macro, then decided to moved the code
into a separate function because it looked nicer and didn't have any
risk of name clashes.
> In any case, we most definitely do not want functions in header
> files.
Does this mean I should move the code into the macro or into an
out-of-line function? There's little point in an out-of-line
function, IMO, so I'd prefer the macro, but I'm concerned about name
clashes.
--
Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Developer aoliva@{cygnus.com, redhat.com}
CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist *Please* write to mailing lists, not to me