This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: (i386-linux x sh-elf) build breakage


On Jul 26, 2000, Richard Henderson <rth@cygnus.com> wrote:

> On Wed, Jul 26, 2000 at 01:21:14AM -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
>> +static inline void
>> +insn_addresses__new (insn, addr)
>> +     rtx insn;
>> +     int addr;
>> +{

> What in the world is this?



Weird.  I must have failed to update the patch.  It's used by
INSN_ADDRESSES_NEW(), to avoid having a (not that) long macro and the
problems of evaluating arguments multiple times.  

It doesn't have the double underscores the sources I used for testing,
but I remember having a previous build fail because I had inserted the
additional underscores then changed my mind about them.  I thought of
inserting them to avoid someone inadvertently using the function
instead of the macro, since the macro might change.

> Ignoring it's other blatent problems

What other blatant problems?

-- 
Alexandre Oliva   Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Developer                  aoliva@{cygnus.com, redhat.com}
CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp        oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist    *Please* write to mailing lists, not to me


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]