This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: (i386-linux x sh-elf) build breakage
On Jul 26, 2000, Richard Henderson <rth@cygnus.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 26, 2000 at 01:21:14AM -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
>> +static inline void
>> +insn_addresses__new (insn, addr)
>> + rtx insn;
>> + int addr;
>> +{
> What in the world is this?
Weird. I must have failed to update the patch. It's used by
INSN_ADDRESSES_NEW(), to avoid having a (not that) long macro and the
problems of evaluating arguments multiple times.
It doesn't have the double underscores the sources I used for testing,
but I remember having a previous build fail because I had inserted the
additional underscores then changed my mind about them. I thought of
inserting them to avoid someone inadvertently using the function
instead of the macro, since the macro might change.
> Ignoring it's other blatent problems
What other blatant problems?
--
Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Developer aoliva@{cygnus.com, redhat.com}
CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist *Please* write to mailing lists, not to me