Re: RFC: No recursion into language subdirectories

[Zack Weinberg <zack at wolery dot cumb dot org>]

On Mon, Jun 19, 2000 at 11:40:49PM -0700, Mark Mitchell wrote:
> >>>>> "Zack" == Zack Weinberg <zack@wolery.cumb.org> writes:
> 
>     Zack> Do you have any ideas how to deal with the warnings?  That's
>     Zack> the only place I can't think of anything.  I'd be prepared
>     Zack> to either ignore the extra warnings or insist they be
>     Zack> cleaned up, but others may not agree.
> 
> I, however, agree.  If the warnings are worth cleaning up, they'll get
> cleaned up.

Okay.

...
> The thing you are suggesting sounds better than what we have now, so I
> think we should press forward.

Right.  As a next step, I'll split out the patches that are just
rearranging things in C++ and Fortran, test them in the old framework,
and submit them separately.

> I think we should also remove any Makefiles in the front-end
> directories; they will probably not work quite consistently anyhow.
> You can always say `make jc1' in the `gcc' directory anyhow.  We
> could even have a `make java' or `make cp' targets, if required.

Fine by me, and simplifies things even more.  I think your 
`make java', etc. targets already exist, because of $(LANGUAGES).

zw