This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [testsuite] C++ i386 ICE
- To: Jason Merrill <jason at cygnus dot com>
- Subject: Re: [testsuite] C++ i386 ICE
- From: Nathan Sidwell <nathan at codesourcery dot com>
- Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2000 09:40:54 +0100
- CC: law at cygnus dot com, Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Organization: Codesourcery LLC
- References: <803.960612248@upchuck> <u94s6xrvgc.fsf@decepticon.cygnus.com>
Jason Merrill wrote:
>
> >>>>> Jeffrey A Law <law@cygnus.com> writes:
>
> > This is fine. THough the C++ folks might want it marked as xfail.
>
> I'd like to revise that policy slightly; tests which work with past
> releases should not be marked as XFAIL. Any objections?
would it not be better to put them in GNATS as critical severity?
nathan
--
Dr Nathan Sidwell :: http://www.codesourcery.com :: CodeSourcery LLC
'But that's a lie.' - 'Yes it is. What's your point?'
nathan@codesourcery.com : http://www.cs.bris.ac.uk/~nathan/ : nathan@acm.org