This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: C++ vs. aliasing

To: jason at cygnus dot com
Subject: Re: C++ vs. aliasing
From: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
Date: Tue, 06 Jun 2000 22:47:14 -0700
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Organization: CodeSourcery, LLC
References: <20000606145643F.mitchell@codesourcery.com><u9ln0iw34b.fsf@decepticon.cygnus.com>

>>>>> "Jason" == Jason Merrill <jason@cygnus.com> writes:

>>>>> Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com> writes:

    >> Kenner's recent aliasing changes weren't safe in C++; a C++
    >> RECORD_TYPEs TYPE_FIELDs list does not list base classes, which
    >> means that we could miss possible aliases.

    Jason> We could look through TYPE_BINFO_BASETYPES.

Indeed.  That was my long-term plan. :-)

--
Mark Mitchell                   mark@codesourcery.com
CodeSourcery, LLC               http://www.codesourcery.com

References:
- C++ vs. aliasing
  - From: Mark Mitchell
- Re: C++ vs. aliasing
  - From: Jason Merrill

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]