This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: 64-bit mn10300 prologue bug
- To: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at cygnus dot com>
- Subject: Re: 64-bit mn10300 prologue bug
- From: Jeffrey A Law <law at cygnus dot com>
- Date: Thu, 18 May 2000 15:55:19 -0600
- cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Reply-To: law at cygnus dot com
In message <orzopnljtf.fsf@saci.lsd.ic.unicamp.br>you write:
> I picked `long' because it's guaranteed to be at least 32 bits long,
> and that's exactly the number of bits we need. Not that more bits
> would hurt (they wouldn't), but I'd rather not go for a `long long'
> when a `long' will do.
The only time a HOST_WIDE_INT will be a long long will be when the target
needs to support something like TImode and the host only as 32bit longs. ie,
very very rarely. 99% of the time HOST_WIDE_INT will be a "long".
jeff