This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: ia64 cond_exec

To: Jim Wilson <wilson at cygnus dot com>
Subject: Re: ia64 cond_exec
From: Richard Henderson <rth at cygnus dot com>
Date: Mon, 8 May 2000 15:37:04 -0700
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
References: <20000506185815.B22588@cygnus.com> <200005082231.PAA25894@rtl.cygnus.com>

On Mon, May 08, 2000 at 03:31:50PM -0700, Jim Wilson wrote:
> You added a new function predicate_operator, but didn't add a prototype
> for it in ia64-protos.h.

Oops.  I thought I did.

> However, I suspect you needed to do this because we can't predicate a
> comment.  I think an explanatory comment would be useful here.

Yes.  I'll add that momentarily.

> I see you added support for both EQ and NE in if_then_else patterns.  Why?

No special reason.  Mostly just using match_operator so that
I can use match_dup when constructing the cond_exec pattern.
Although I guess that isn't necessary either...

r~

References:
- ia64 cond_exec
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: ia64 cond_exec
  - From: Jim Wilson

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]