PATCH: htdocs/gcc-3.0/criteria.html (more typos) *real copy*

[Kelley Cook <kelleycook at yahoo dot com>]

Sorry about that ... using stupid Yahoo Mail due to ORBS

 -- Kelley Cook (still no write access)

--- criteria.htm	Wed May 03 15:59:42 2000
+++ criteria-new.html	Wed May 03 16:05:44 2000
@@ -21,3 +21,3 @@
 release.  For example, if support for the Intel Pentium II is required
-by the release criteria, it is never-the-less unlikely that GCC 3.0
+by the release criteria, it is nevertheless unlikely that GCC 3.0
 would be released even though it did not support the Intel
@@ -112,3 +112,3 @@
 at least bootstrap itself on each of these secondary platforms.  That
-committment doesn't necessarily mean fixing bugs personally; for
+commitment doesn't necessarily mean fixing bugs personally; for
 example, if you are a manager for a company with GCC expertise you
@@ -207,3 +207,3 @@
 kernel developers pay careful attention to GCC performance.  It would
-be an embarassment to GCC 3.0 if it did not compile the kernel
+be an embarrassment to GCC 3.0 if it did not compile the kernel
 correctly, out of the box.  The kernel taxes many of the low-level
@@ -270,3 +270,3 @@
 
-<p>There is a preception that development snapshots take longer to
+<p>There is a perception that development snapshots take longer to
 compile programs than their 2.95.2 counterparts, and that they often




__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Send instant messages & get email alerts with Yahoo! Messenger.
http://im.yahoo.com/