This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: [PATCH] Sparc tail calls (take 4)

To: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Sparc tail calls (take 4)
From: Richard Henderson <rth at cygnus dot com>
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2000 13:32:17 -0800
Cc: Jeffrey A Law <law at cygnus dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
References: <20000324112526.B19711@cygnus.com> <20933.953926036@upchuck> <20000324122246.A19852@cygnus.com> <20000324221830.I555@mff.cuni.cz>

On Fri, Mar 24, 2000 at 10:18:30PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> In SPARC do_jump_if_equal case the exact numbers are like this:
> current_function_args_size is 24 (although it has only 4 args,
> REG_PARM_STACK_SPACE has reserved space for 6 args), args_size.constant
> before compute_argument_block_size is 32 (8 arguments) and
> compute_argument_block_size subtracts REG_PARM_STACK_SPACE from it ...

Ah hah!  Ok, move the test.


r~

References:
- Re: [PATCH] Sparc tail calls (take 4)
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: [PATCH] Sparc tail calls (take 4)
  - From: Jeffrey A Law
- Re: [PATCH] Sparc tail calls (take 4)
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: [PATCH] Sparc tail calls (take 4)
  - From: Jakub Jelinek

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]