This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Patch to merge emit_library_call and emit_library_call_value
- To: Jan Hubicka <hubicka at atrey dot karlin dot mff dot cuni dot cz>
- Subject: Re: Patch to merge emit_library_call and emit_library_call_value
- From: Jeffrey A Law <law at cygnus dot com>
- Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2000 08:57:18 -0700
- cc: Richard Henderson <rth at cygnus dot com>, egcs-patches at egcs dot cygnus dot com
- Reply-To: law at cygnus dot com
In message <20000322114851.A8072@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>you write:
> > On Tue, Mar 07, 2000 at 03:08:03PM +0100, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> > > * calls.c (emit_library_call_value_1): Break out from ...; hand
> le
> > > VOIDmode function calls too.
> > > (emit_library_call_value): ... here.
> > > (emit_library_call): Implement by calling emit_library_call_val
> ue_1.
> >
> > Ok.
>
> Hi
> I've reinstalled this patch (reverted by Richard because of the problems
> with previous one)
> It needed some changes, so here is what I've installed:
Did you bootstrap and run the testsuite?
I sent a message to everyone with write access a short while ago which
indicated that no patches should be going into the tree without a bootstrap
and regression test.
Nor did I see an approval for this patch. If you have to change the patch
any non-trivial way, it needs to be re-approved.
Please un-install this patch and follow procedures.
Thanks,
jeff