This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: Speeding up ggc-simple on stage1

To: oliva at lsd dot ic dot unicamp dot br
Subject: Re: Speeding up ggc-simple on stage1
From: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2000 08:57:52 -0800
Cc: rth at cygnus dot com, law at cygnus dot com, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Organization: CodeSourcery, LLC
References: <or7lharfst.fsf@garnize.lsd.ic.unicamp.br><20000116041016.B19531@cygnus.com><or3dryf0jl.fsf@garnize.lsd.ic.unicamp.br>

>>>>> "Alexandre" == Alexandre Oliva <oliva@lsd.ic.unicamp.br> writes:

    Alexandre> Ok to install?

Yes.  Thanks!

I'm not crazy about the name HAVE_MMAP_ZERO.  How about
HAVE_MMAP_UNFIXED, since the the thing you're testing is that you
can't use MAX_FIXED?  The `0' isn't a very important aspect of `mmap
(0, ..., ...)'; it's just a way of saying "any memory will do".

If you disagree, go ahead and put in the patch you've got; I'm just
objecting on the grounds that `HAVE_MMAP_ZERO' doesn't seem too
meaningful to me.

--
Mark Mitchell                   mark@codesourcery.com
CodeSourcery, LLC               http://www.codesourcery.com

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Speeding up ggc-simple on stage1
  - From: Alexandre Oliva

References:
- Re: Speeding up ggc-simple on stage1
  - From: Alexandre Oliva
- Re: Speeding up ggc-simple on stage1
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: Speeding up ggc-simple on stage1
  - From: Alexandre Oliva

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]