This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: Redundant (?) test in ix86_expand_{setcc,int_movcc}

To: Richard Henderson <rth at cygnus dot com>, egcs-patches at egcs dot cygnus dot com
Subject: Re: Redundant (?) test in ix86_expand_{setcc,int_movcc}
From: grahams <grahams at rcp dot co dot uk>
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2000 19:56:02 +0000
References: <orr9fsti5f.fsf@garnize.lsd.ic.unicamp.br> <20000110114714.D4705@cygnus.com>

Richard

Richard Henderson wrote:
> 
> On Sat, Jan 08, 2000 at 06:36:44PM -0200, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> > -  else if (reg_overlap_mentioned_p (dest, ix86_compare_op0)
> > -        || reg_overlap_mentioned_p (dest, ix86_compare_op0))
> 
> The second is clearly a typo for ix86_compare_op1.
> 
> r~

This is not the only instance of this typo there is another in
ix86_expand_int_movcc()

Graham

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Redundant (?) test in ix86_expand_{setcc,int_movcc}
  - From: Jeffrey A Law

References:
- Redundant (?) test in ix86_expand_{setcc,int_movcc}
  - From: Alexandre Oliva
- Re: Redundant (?) test in ix86_expand_{setcc,int_movcc}
  - From: Richard Henderson

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]