This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH] fix passing MAKEINFOFLAGS down to sub-makes
- To: law at cygnus dot com
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix passing MAKEINFOFLAGS down to sub-makes
- From: Franz Sirl <Franz dot Sirl-kernel at lauterbach dot com>
- Date: Thu, 24 Jun 1999 11:31:53 +0200
- Cc: egcs-patches at egcs dot cygnus dot com
- References: <Your message of Wed, 23 Jun 1999 23:30:26 +0200. <99062323363300.01327@ns1102.munich.netsurf.de>
At 00:47 24.06.99 , Jeffrey A Law wrote:
> In message <99062323363300.01327@ns1102.munich.netsurf.de>you write:
> >
> > --Boundary-=_nWlrBbmQBhCDarzOwKkYHIDdqSCD
> > Content-Type: text/plain
> > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > the toplevel Makefile doesn't handle MAKEINFO/MAKEINFOFLAGS correctly.
> > Currently neither setting MAKEINFO="makeinfo --no-split" nor setting
> > MAKEINFOFLAGS="--no-split" has the desired effect. The attached patch
> fixes
> > this. It should go both into the mainline and the branch.
>I'd prefer not to do this. It doesn't fix a critical bug and I don't want to
>burn time messing around with too much make/configury junk knowing it's going
>to get revamped in the near future.
>
>Why do you think this is needed for gcc-2.95? No, I don't consider the
>ability
>to pass args to makeinfo important enough for gcc-2.95.
Because it's a regression in the build process compared to egcs-1.1.2.
Passing MAKEINFO="makeinfo --no-split" did work in egcs-1.1.2 and was used
by distribution builders like RedHat. Either passing MAKEINFO from the
toplevel Makefile to the subs should be respected again, or MAKEINFOFLAGS
should be passed correctly.
Franz.