This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

[PATCH] fix passing MAKEINFOFLAGS down to sub-makes


Hi,

the toplevel Makefile doesn't handle MAKEINFO/MAKEINFOFLAGS correctly.
Currently neither setting MAKEINFO="makeinfo --no-split" nor setting
MAKEINFOFLAGS="--no-split" has the desired effect. The attached patch fixes
this. It should go both into the mainline and the branch.

Franz.

	* Makefile.in: fix passing of MAKEINFO and MAKEINFOFLAGS to sub-makes


Index: Makefile.in
===================================================================
RCS file: /egcs/carton/cvsfiles/egcs/Makefile.in,v
retrieving revision 1.39.4.2
diff -u -p -r1.39.4.2 Makefile.in
--- Makefile.in	1999/06/22 22:44:42	1.39.4.2
+++ Makefile.in	1999/06/23 21:17:14
@@ -389,7 +389,8 @@ BASE_FLAGS_TO_PASS = \
 	"LIBCXXFLAGS_FOR_TARGET=$(LIBCXXFLAGS_FOR_TARGET)" \
 	"M4=$(M4)" \
 	"MAKE=$(MAKE)" \
-	"MAKEINFO=$(MAKEINFO) $(MAKEINFOFLAGS)" \
+	"MAKEINFO=$(MAKEINFO)" \
+	"MAKEINFOFLAGS=$(MAKEINFOFLAGS)" \
 	"NM_FOR_TARGET=$(NM_FOR_TARGET)" \
 	"RANLIB_FOR_TARGET=$(RANLIB_FOR_TARGET)" \
 	"RPATH_ENVVAR=$(RPATH_ENVVAR)" \
Index: Makefile.in
===================================================================
RCS file: /egcs/carton/cvsfiles/egcs/Makefile.in,v
retrieving revision 1.39.4.2
diff -u -p -r1.39.4.2 Makefile.in
--- Makefile.in	1999/06/22 22:44:42	1.39.4.2
+++ Makefile.in	1999/06/23 21:17:14
@@ -389,7 +389,8 @@ BASE_FLAGS_TO_PASS = \
 	"LIBCXXFLAGS_FOR_TARGET=$(LIBCXXFLAGS_FOR_TARGET)" \
 	"M4=$(M4)" \
 	"MAKE=$(MAKE)" \
-	"MAKEINFO=$(MAKEINFO) $(MAKEINFOFLAGS)" \
+	"MAKEINFO=$(MAKEINFO)" \
+	"MAKEINFOFLAGS=$(MAKEINFOFLAGS)" \
 	"NM_FOR_TARGET=$(NM_FOR_TARGET)" \
 	"RANLIB_FOR_TARGET=$(RANLIB_FOR_TARGET)" \
 	"RPATH_ENVVAR=$(RPATH_ENVVAR)" \

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]