This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Creating a prettier flow graph
- To: Richard Henderson <rth at cygnus dot com>
- Subject: Re: Creating a prettier flow graph
- From: Jeffrey A Law <law at cygnus dot com>
- Date: Sun, 25 Oct 1998 12:14:09 -0700
- cc: Bernd Schmidt <crux at pool dot informatik dot rwth-aachen dot de>, egcs-patches at cygnus dot com
- Reply-To: law at cygnus dot com
In message <19981023103904.A11808@dot.cygnus.com>you write:
> On Fri, Oct 23, 1998 at 01:31:18PM +0200, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
> > I can send a new patch on Monday; however, I'm not sure what's happening
> > with rth's similar patches - we should try to avoid duplication of effort
> .
> > Richard, what are your plans?
>
> I've got the patch bootstrapping on Alpha. Last I checked it didn't
> on x86 or sparc -- that's probably been fixed now. There are about
> a half-dozen regressions remaining on the Alpha.
I'm considering asking folks to slow down a little on major overhauls so that
we can shake out the assortment of problems in the tree right now. It may
be best to go with Bernd's patch first since it does a minor cleanup instead
of revamping a large part of the compiler.
> I want to take care of these things, and then I'll stage in the patch.
> (About 2/3 of it is basic_block_{head,end}[b] -> BLOCK_{HEAD,END} (b).)
We may want to go ahead and make this change separate from your rework. It'll
also make your rework easier to read :-)
jeff