This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: warnings patch for top level gcc directory
- To: "Kaveh R. Ghazi" <ghazi at caip dot rutgers dot edu>, egcs-patches at cygnus dot com, rth at cygnus dot com
- Subject: Re: warnings patch for top level gcc directory
- From: Richard Henderson <rth at cygnus dot com>
- Date: Mon, 19 Oct 1998 09:39:47 -0700
- References: <199810191405.KAA00786@caip.rutgers.edu>
- Reply-To: Richard Henderson <rth at cygnus dot com>
On Mon, Oct 19, 1998 at 10:05:02AM -0400, Kaveh R. Ghazi wrote:
> Okay, but why then does it *only* claim to return on OSF4? Is
> that a fluke / bug in the flow code again?
I don't know.
> Hmm, if a function calls longjmp() as its last statement, is
> it safe to mark as `noreturn' or do we need to generate the full
> epilogue there too?
A function that exists via longjmp does not use the normal
epilogue. So it could be marked noreturn, yes.
r~