Re: FIX_REGISTER_CHECK

[Gavin Romig-Koch <gavin at cygnus dot com>]

Jim Wilson writes:
 > trying to add a helpful but not strictly necessary error message.  Now I
 > see that you are trying to fix a serious problem.

Somehow I believed this was a well known problem.  In retrospect it clearly
wasn't.  I should have noted I was fixing an internal error.  

 > I already mentioned that fp and sp are invalid for all targets, so you could
 > add machine independent code to give an error for these two registers.  This
 > avoids the abort without requiring a new macro.

I agree that this is the best solution for now.  I'll submit such a patch
later today.

                                                   -gavin...