Re: The recent regclass.c change

[Richard Henderson <rth at cygnus dot com>]

On Mon, Oct 05, 1998 at 11:00:42PM -0600, Jeffrey A Law wrote:
>   > So the
>   > real problem is that we get a REG_WAS_0 note, which should be of the
>   > INSN_LIST kind according to rtl.h, but which is in fact EXPR_LIST.
> Ah.  That sounds like the core problem.  One of the questions I asked rth
> when this originally came up was why we had an insn in an EXPR_LIST :-)  I
> just didn't follow through enough on it.

Yep, Jim had told me where the real problem was as well, but
I somehow never got back to this.


r~