This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: Patches to the FAQ and the fatal error messages for guiding bug-reports better



  In message <199809100915.LAA05487@scar.axis.se>you write:
  > No and yes.  The construct I used is already there, and I don't
  > see any error/fatal/ack (or warning for that matter) with
  > embedded newlines.  See for example c-decl.c:1686 (circa), and
  > elsewhere.
See the other thread about fine grained control of warnings.

The fact that we call warning() multiple times for a single warning
is a long standing bug in several places in the compiler.  We should
fix them, but in the mean time we should not add more instances of
the bug.

jeff


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]