This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: %[spec] and x86 cpp option problems
- To: Jim Wilson <wilson at cygnus dot com>
- Subject: Re: %[spec] and x86 cpp option problems
- From: Jeffrey A Law <law at cygnus dot com>
- Date: Mon, 13 Jul 1998 23:39:22 -0600
- cc: egcs-patches at cygnus dot com, scox at cygnus dot com, drepper at cygnus dot com
- Reply-To: law at cygnus dot com
In message <199807092314.QAA01070@ada.cygnus.com.cygnus.com>you write:
> The x86 ports have 2 minor bugs in the the cpp option support.
> 1) When -ansi is used, they define macros in user namespace, e.g. -Di386.
> 2) Some macros defined by gcc-126.96.36.199 aren't defined anymore, e.g. -D__i386.
> rarer and rarer, I don't think we should complicate the %() support to make
> it easy to define non-ansi macros.
> One problem with this is that it means specs aren't backward compatible,
> which means that people using -b or -V may get errors. These options have
> have never been safe, and I have always recommended against their use, but we
> may need to keep them working. I could perhaps just give a warning instead
> of an error when % is used.
I'm not too concerned about this.
> Thu Jul 9 15:24:18 1998 Jim Wilson <email@example.com>
> * i386/i386.h (CPP_486_SPEC, CPP_586_SPEC, CPP_686_SPEC): New specs.
> (CPP_CPU_DEFAULT_SPEC, CPP_CPU_SPEC): Use them.
> (EXTRA_SPECS): Support them.
> * gcc.c: Delete %[spec] support.
> (do_spec_1, case '('): Likewise.
> (do_spec_1, case '['): Call error.
> * i386/aix386ng.h, cygwin32.h, freebsd-elf.h, gas.h, isc.h,
> linux-aout.h, linux-oldld.h, linux.h, osfelf.h, osfrose.h, sco.h,
> sco4.h, sco4dbx.h, sco5.h, sol2.h, sysv3.h (CPP_SPEC): Delete
I went ahead and committed the patch since I'm trying to get the egcs-1.1
branch made tonight.