This is the mail archive of the gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
| Other format: | [Raw text] | |
This message better belongs here I guess.
-------- 转发的消息 --------
主题: [Mingw-w64-public] MingW64 doesn't generate line numbers debugging
information for lambdas
日期: Tue, 18 Feb 2020 13:44:04 +0300
发件人: Artem Razin <artem.razin@gmail.com>
回复地址: mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net
收件人: mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net
Hi,
I hope this is the right place to ask about DWARF and mingw64.
First of all, here the version I use:
g++.EXE (i686-posix-dwarf-rev0, Built by MinGW-W64 project) 7.3.0
Copyright (C) 2017 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO
warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
I've developed a debugger (Deleaker, a memory profiler for Windows)
that supports range of debugging information formats, including DWARF.
Recently I've experienced strange thing: mingw64 doesn't emit
information about line numbers for lambdas.
Here what I compiled:
void CallLambda(void (*lambda)());
int main()
{
for (int i = 0; i < 10000; i++)
CallLambda([]()-> void // <-- line #27
{
CallLambda([]()-> void
{
new int;
new int;
});
});
return 0;
}
void CallLambda(void (*lambda)())
{
lambda(); // <-- line #138
}
My debugger hooks calls of operator new and saves call stacks. Later
entries are resolved.
Here the call stack:
libstdc++-6.dll!Znwy + 0x17 bytes 000000006fd07287
main.exe!0000000000401571 (for another new int here the address
main.exe!000000000040157b)
main.exe!0000000000401594
main.exe!_Z10CallLambdaPFvvE Line 138 + 0x10 bytes 00000000004019f8
main.exe!00000000004015cd
main.exe!00000000004015e6
main.exe!_Z10CallLambdaPFvvE Line 138 + 0x10 bytes 00000000004019f8
main.exe!main Line 25 + 0x2c bytes 000000000040162f
I dumped the DWARF debugging information and found the only place that
corresponds to both addresses 0x401571 and 0x40157b:
< 4><0x00005b48> DW_TAG_structure_type
DW_AT_name <lambda()>
DW_AT_decl_file 0x00000001
I:/Projects/deleaker/branches/branch_2020_02_10_leak_in_lambda/deleaker2/TestProjects/MingwTest/main.cpp
DW_AT_decl_line 0x0000001b
...
< 5><0x00005b6e> DW_TAG_subprogram
...
DW_AT_low_pc 0x00401560
DW_AT_high_pc
<offset-from-lowpc>39
Here the entire output:
https://gist.github.com/ArtemRazin/515f81d5825608b87fbceaee89d81503
So it seems that the information is not enough to locate line numbers
for 0x401571 and 0x40157b: parent node DW_TAG_structure_type contains
DW_AT_decl_line = 0x0000001b = 27.
I believe I missed something.
Thank you!
--
Best regards,
Artem A. Razin
_______________________________________________
Mingw-w64-public mailing list
Mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |