This is the mail archive of the
gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: GCC 8 released but not successful ?
- From: Dennis Clarke <dclarke at blastwave dot org>
- To: Xi Ruoyao <ryxi at stu dot xidian dot edu dot cn>
- Cc: gcc-help <gcc-help at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Fri, 4 May 2018 11:08:40 -0400
- Subject: Re: GCC 8 released but not successful ?
- References: <178d4da5-ce26-75d6-701c-73e165150c2a@blastwave.org> <1525024645.13111.8.camel@stu.xidian.edu.cn> <ffd12d5f-350e-fe1f-6cef-43a39d26163e@blastwave.org> <1525445183.25571.11.camel@stu.xidian.edu.cn>
On 04/05/18 10:46 AM, Xi Ruoyao wrote:
On 2018-04-29 14:47 -0400, Dennis Clarke wrote:
I think we still need a human to look over the results and then
determine to what degree the results are reasonably clean or just
another nightmare of fails in gfortran and g++ and go etc etc.
AFAIK on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, I think we can only ignore some FAILs in
gcc.dg/guality. They use GDB and the result (debugger output) tends to
be wrong with optimization. Other tests should not FAIL.
My result was sent:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2018-05/msg00374.html
# of unexpected failures 72
That looks really good.
I don't have platforms other than x86_64-pc-linux-gnu (though I may buy
a mips64 in 2019).
I have builds going now on ppc64 and sparc64.
Dennis