gcc-help archive
date index for May, 2017

This is the mail archive of the gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

May 31, 2017
16:20 Re: Prohibiting use of some registers in the GCC compiler Nisal Menuka
13:41 Re: LTO & aarch64 Richard Earnshaw (lists)
13:37 Re: Prohibiting use of some registers in the GCC compiler Richard Earnshaw (lists)
13:33 Re: LTO & aarch64 John Pullen
13:32 Re: LTO & aarch64 Richard Earnshaw (lists)
08:32 Re: Exception handling Andrew Haley
06:37 Re: Bitfield insert and extract instructions are not generated Mahesh Bodapati
01:00 Re: -std=c90 -pedantic-errors and <stdint.h> Xi Ruoyao
00:34 persistent threads in a nested parallel region Jakub Kurzak

May 30, 2017
23:41 Re: Prohibiting use of some registers in the GCC compiler John Pullen
23:34 Prohibiting use of some registers in the GCC compiler Nisal Menuka
23:23 Re: -std=c90 -pedantic-errors and <stdint.h> Vincent Lefevre
23:11 Re: -std=c90 -pedantic-errors and <stdint.h> Vincent Lefevre
21:04 Re: -std=c90 -pedantic-errors and <stdint.h> Florian Weimer
18:52 Bitfield insert and extract instructions are not generated Mahesh Bodapati
17:12 Re: GCC in-line assembly and the removal of -mcx16 Alexander Monakov
16:41 Re: GCC in-line assembly and the removal of -mcx16 Alexander Monakov
16:19 Re: -std=c90 -pedantic-errors and <stdint.h> Xi Ruoyao
16:04 Re: GCC in-line assembly and the removal of -mcx16 Andrew Haley
15:10 -std=c90 -pedantic-errors and <stdint.h> Vincent Lefevre
14:52 Re: GCC in-line assembly and the removal of -mcx16 Alexander Monakov
14:02 Re: GCC in-line assembly and the removal of -mcx16 Jonathan Wakely
13:57 Re: GCC in-line assembly and the removal of -mcx16 Andrew Haley
12:09 perf error duringAutoFDO tutorial Nobutarou Nosuke
10:38 Re: GCC in-line assembly and the removal of -mcx16 Toebs Douglass
10:28 Re: GCC in-line assembly and the removal of -mcx16 Jonathan Wakely

May 29, 2017
15:36 Re: GCC in-line assembly and the removal of -mcx16 Andrew Haley
09:09 Re: Exception handling Florian Weimer
09:00 Exception handling Flis, Przemyslaw (Nokia - PL/W

May 28, 2017
11:15 Re: GCC in-line assembly and the removal of -mcx16 Toebs Douglass
01:40 Re: GCC in-line assembly and the removal of -mcx16 Toebs Douglass

May 27, 2017
13:40 LTO & aarch64 John Pullen

May 26, 2017
20:41 Re: GCC in-line assembly and the removal of -mcx16 Toebs Douglass
20:32 Re: GCC in-line assembly and the removal of -mcx16 Alexander Monakov
18:54 Re: GCC in-line assembly and the removal of -mcx16 Toebs Douglass
18:52 Re: GCC in-line assembly and the removal of -mcx16 Toebs Douglass
11:15 Re: GCC in-line assembly and the removal of -mcx16 Toebs Douglass
10:51 Re: GCC in-line assembly and the removal of -mcx16 Alexander Monakov
10:03 Re: GCC in-line assembly and the removal of -mcx16 Toebs Douglass
09:53 Re: GCC in-line assembly and the removal of -mcx16 Alexander Monakov
08:59 GCC in-line assembly and the removal of -mcx16 Toebs Douglass

May 25, 2017
23:59 Re: boehm-gc and gcc 7.1 Xi Ruoyao
21:16 boehm-gc and gcc 7.1 Reinoud Koornstra

May 24, 2017
21:19 Re: User-space code aborts on some (but not all) misaligned accesses Mason
17:40 Re: User-space code aborts on some (but not all) misaligned accesses Ard Biesheuvel
17:36 Re: User-space code aborts on some (but not all) misaligned accesses Robin Murphy
17:27 Re: User-space code aborts on some (but not all) misaligned accesses Ard Biesheuvel
17:25 Re: User-space code aborts on some (but not all) misaligned accesses Robin Murphy
16:56 Re: User-space code aborts on some (but not all) misaligned accesses Mason
15:45 Re: User-space code aborts on some (but not all) misaligned accesses Robin Murphy
15:26 User-space code aborts on some (but not all) misaligned accesses Mason

May 22, 2017
11:49 Re: How to use higher ISA's while restraining GCC to lower ISA's Jonathan Wakely
06:46 How to use higher ISA's while restraining GCC to lower ISA's Jeffrey Walton

May 21, 2017
19:01 use gcc-6.3.0 with its compiled new glibc-2.25 bastl

May 20, 2017
09:48 Re: -march=native Toebs Douglass
09:47 Re: -march=native David Abdurachmanov
09:45 Re: -march=native Toebs Douglass
09:42 Re: -march=native Toebs Douglass
09:39 -march=native Toebs Douglass

May 19, 2017
00:55 Simple inline Sparc assembly example : set input and get output - right syntax hpti

May 18, 2017
19:17 Re: Replies to mailing list not listed as follow up to original message on mailing list archive Segher Boessenkool
18:09 Replies to mailing list not listed as follow up to original message on mailing list archive Jozef Lawrynowicz
15:37 [PATCH] Fix compiler errors on MinGW-w64 due to identifier collision with macros. Liu Hao

May 17, 2017
21:34 Re: Binary compatibility between an old static libstdc++ and a new dynamic one Guilherme Quentel Melo
21:12 How build libsupc++ only fedor_qd via gcc-help
13:47 Re: Word arounds for incorrect result with uint128_t on PPC64? Jonathan Wakely
09:17 Re: build issue for gcc-4.8.5 on ubuntu 16.04 Jonathan Wakely
08:58 Re: build issue for gcc-4.8.5 on ubuntu 16.04 Xi Ruoyao
08:39 Re: build issue for gcc-4.8.5 on ubuntu 16.04 Pintu

May 16, 2017
14:44 Re: build issue for gcc-4.8.5 on ubuntu 16.04 Toebs Douglass
14:38 Re: build issue for gcc-4.8.5 on ubuntu 16.04 Pintu
10:19 Re: [Mingw-w64-public] Fwd: Re: [PATCH] Include driverspecs.h in specstrings.h. Liu Hao
10:10 Re: [Mingw-w64-public] Fwd: Re: [PATCH] Include driverspecs.h in specstrings.h. Jonathan Wakely
10:09 Re: [Mingw-w64-public] Fwd: Re: [PATCH] Include driverspecs.h in specstrings.h. Jonathan Wakely
10:02 Re: [Mingw-w64-public] Fwd: Re: [PATCH] Include driverspecs.h in specstrings.h. Liu Hao
09:35 Re: [Mingw-w64-public] Fwd: Re: [PATCH] Include driverspecs.h in specstrings.h. Jonathan Wakely
04:04 Re: __builtin_isnanl() and invalid x87 80-bit floating point numbers Liu Hao

May 15, 2017
21:02 Re: result of fabs or fma when <math.h> is not included? Georg-Johann Lay
19:47 Re: result of fabs or fma when <math.h> is not included? Florian Weimer
16:43 Re: __builtin_isnanl() and invalid x87 80-bit floating point numbers Vincent Lefevre
14:35 Re: __builtin_isnanl() and invalid x87 80-bit floating point numbers Liu Hao
13:50 Re: result of fabs or fma when <math.h> is not included? Vincent Lefevre
13:29 Re: help with improving compile times Matthias Kretz
13:25 Re: result of fabs or fma when <math.h> is not included? Mason
13:16 Re: help with improving compile times Markus Trippelsdorf
13:07 Re: help with improving compile times Mason
12:02 Re: __builtin_isnanl() and invalid x87 80-bit floating point numbers Vincent Lefevre
12:01 Re: help with improving compile times Markus Trippelsdorf
11:22 result of fabs or fma when <math.h> is not included? Vincent Lefevre
11:05 Re: help with improving compile times Mason
10:11 help with improving compile times Matthias Kretz
09:18 Re: autovectorization of outer loop Alexey Salmin
08:14 Re: autovectorization of outer loop Alexey Salmin

May 14, 2017
13:06 Proper way of modifying the AST Marcwell Helpdesk

May 13, 2017
16:43 Re: __builtin_isnanl() and invalid x87 80-bit floating point numbers Liu Hao
15:58 Re: __builtin_isnanl() and invalid x87 80-bit floating point numbers Vincent Lefevre
11:50 Re: Word arounds for incorrect result with uint128_t on PPC64? Jonathan Wakely
04:34 Word arounds for incorrect result with uint128_t on PPC64? Jeffrey Walton
03:06 Re: __builtin_isnanl() and invalid x87 80-bit floating point numbers Liu Hao
02:25 Re: __builtin_isnanl() and invalid x87 80-bit floating point numbers Vincent Lefevre

May 12, 2017
15:46 Re: __builtin_isnanl() and invalid x87 80-bit floating point numbers Liu Hao
12:20 Re: build issue for gcc-4.8.5 on ubuntu 16.04 Mason
12:06 Re: build issue for gcc-4.8.5 on ubuntu 16.04 Jonathan Wakely
11:47 build issue for gcc-4.8.5 on ubuntu 16.04 Pintu
10:48 Re: __builtin_isnanl() and invalid x87 80-bit floating point numbers Vincent Lefevre
10:27 Re: GCC compilation with -fuse-linker-plugin support Gaël Donval

May 11, 2017
16:55 Re: [Mingw-w64-public] Fwd: Re: [PATCH] Include driverspecs.h in specstrings.h. David Grayson
14:59 GCC compilation with -fuse-linker-plugin support Gaël Donval
14:29 Re: [Mingw-w64-public] Fwd: Re: [PATCH] Include driverspecs.h in specstrings.h. Liu Hao
08:34 Re: What is the best way to add a target specific system header directory Kai Ruottu
04:32 RE: What is the best way to add a target specific system header directory Fiodar Stryzhniou via gcc-help

May 10, 2017
06:32 Fwd: autovectorization of outer loop Jyotirmoy Bhattacharya

May 09, 2017
04:22 Re: question about malloc attribute Xi Ruoyao
04:03 Re: What is the best way to add a target specific system header directory Xi Ruoyao

May 08, 2017
18:46 What is the best way to add a target specific system header directory Martin J. O'Riordan
15:18 Re: question about malloc attribute Prathamesh Kulkarni
11:49 Re: GCC 7.1, cygwin, undefined reference to ___divmoddi4 Thomas Plank
05:23 Re: GCC 7.1, cygwin, undefined reference to ___divmoddi4 Xi Ruoyao
04:42 Implement weak __divmoddi4() and __udivmoddi4() for internal use by the CRT and winpthreads? Liu Hao
02:13 Re: GCC 7.1, cygwin, undefined reference to ___divmoddi4 Liu Hao

May 07, 2017
23:52 Re: GCC 7.1, cygwin, undefined reference to ___divmoddi4 Thomas Plank
15:41 Re: Memory model release/acquire mode interactions of relaxed atomic operations Toebs Douglass
09:23 Re: Memory model release/acquire mode interactions of relaxed atomic operations Andrew Haley

May 06, 2017
14:59 Re: Difficulty building GCC 7.1 on Bash for Windows 16.04 Florian Weimer
12:47 Re: GCC 7.1, cygwin, undefined reference to ___divmoddi4 JonY
05:11 Re: Difficulty building GCC 7.1 on Bash for Windows 16.04 Christopher Di Bella
01:18 Re: Difficulty building GCC 7.1 on Bash for Windows 16.04 Tim Prince via gcc-help
00:29 Difficulty building GCC 7.1 on Bash for Windows 16.04 Christopher Di Bella

May 05, 2017
20:39 GCC 7.1, cygwin, undefined reference to ___divmoddi4 Thomas Plank
18:00 Re: Memory model release/acquire mode interactions of relaxed atomic operations Toebs Douglass
17:32 Re: Memory model release/acquire mode interactions of relaxed atomic operations Andrew Haley
17:26 Re: Memory model release/acquire mode interactions of relaxed atomic operations Toebs Douglass
16:59 Re: Memory model release/acquire mode interactions of relaxed atomic operations Andrew Haley
16:31 Re: Memory model release/acquire mode interactions of relaxed atomic operations Toebs Douglass
16:27 Re: Memory model release/acquire mode interactions of relaxed atomic operations Toebs Douglass
15:38 Re: question about malloc attribute Martin Sebor
15:27 Re: Strange "UNRESOLVED" test results of GCC Jeff Law
15:17 Re: Memory model release/acquire mode interactions of relaxed atomic operations Andrew Haley
15:09 Re: Strange "UNRESOLVED" test results of GCC Martin Sebor
15:03 Re: Memory model release/acquire mode interactions of relaxed atomic operations Andrew Haley
14:53 Re: Strange "UNRESOLVED" test results of GCC Jeff Law
14:21 question about malloc attribute Prathamesh Kulkarni
14:03 Strange "UNRESOLVED" test results of GCC Xi Ruoyao
11:37 Re: Memory model release/acquire mode interactions of relaxed atomic operations Toebs Douglass
11:23 Re: Possible gfortran documentation oversight with regards to linking options? Jonathan Wakely
09:42 Re: trying to use -fcheck=all option with fortran in LINUX (bash system) and will not recognize option Mason
09:09 Re: Memory model release/acquire mode interactions of relaxed atomic operations Toebs Douglass
08:48 Re: Memory model release/acquire mode interactions of relaxed atomic operations Andrew Haley
08:46 Re: memcpy(3) && memmove(3) Xi Ruoyao
08:16 Re: 404 Jonathan Wakely
07:59 Re: 404 Jonathan Wakely
07:41 404 Olaf van der Spek
07:00 memcpy(3) && memmove(3) Matthias Apitz
03:54 Re: -Wenum-compare and template metaprogramming Xi Ruoyao
00:48 Re: Trouble building gcc 7 on mingw64 (can't find limits.h) Loo Rong Jie

May 04, 2017
22:33 Re: -Wenum-compare and template metaprogramming Jonathan Wakely
20:52 trying to use -fcheck=all option with fortran in LINUX (bash system) and will not recognize option Richard Gustafson
20:18 Re: Memory model release/acquire mode interactions of relaxed atomic operations Toebs Douglass
18:40 gcc 7 vs. -fvisibility=hidden vs. lambdas Avi Kivity
18:04 Re: Memory model release/acquire mode interactions of relaxed atomic operations Andrew Haley
17:47 Re: Trouble building gcc 7 on mingw64 (can't find limits.h) Liu Hao
16:56 Possible gfortran documentation oversight with regards to linking options? Miles McCammon
15:54 Re: Trouble building gcc 7 on mingw64 (can't find limits.h) J.W. Jagersma
15:52 Re: Memory model release/acquire mode interactions of relaxed atomic operations Toebs Douglass
15:39 Re: -Wenum-compare and template metaprogramming Martin Sebor
14:42 Re: Trouble building gcc 7 on mingw64 (can't find limits.h) J.W. Jagersma
14:21 Re: Memory model release/acquire mode interactions of relaxed atomic operations Andrew Haley
14:07 Re: Memory model release/acquire mode interactions of relaxed atomic operations Toebs Douglass
13:19 Re: Memory model release/acquire mode interactions of relaxed atomic operations Jonathan Wakely
13:15 Re: Memory model release/acquire mode interactions of relaxed atomic operations Toebs Douglass
13:11 Re: Memory model release/acquire mode interactions of relaxed atomic operations Toebs Douglass
13:08 Re: Memory model release/acquire mode interactions of relaxed atomic operations Jonathan Wakely
13:06 Re: Memory model release/acquire mode interactions of relaxed atomic operations Jonathan Wakely
13:05 Re: Memory model release/acquire mode interactions of relaxed atomic operations Jonathan Wakely
13:04 Re: Memory model release/acquire mode interactions of relaxed atomic operations Toebs Douglass
13:01 Re: Memory model release/acquire mode interactions of relaxed atomic operations Jonathan Wakely
12:58 Re: Memory model release/acquire mode interactions of relaxed atomic operations Toebs Douglass
12:56 Re: Memory model release/acquire mode interactions of relaxed atomic operations Toebs Douglass
12:56 Re: Memory model release/acquire mode interactions of relaxed atomic operations Andrew Haley
12:53 Re: Memory model release/acquire mode interactions of relaxed atomic operations Andrew Haley
12:49 Re: Memory model release/acquire mode interactions of relaxed atomic operations Jonathan Wakely
12:44 Re: Memory model release/acquire mode interactions of relaxed atomic operations Jonathan Wakely
12:40 Re: Memory model release/acquire mode interactions of relaxed atomic operations Andrew Haley
12:11 Re: Memory model release/acquire mode interactions of relaxed atomic operations Toebs Douglass
12:03 Re: Memory model release/acquire mode interactions of relaxed atomic operations Andrew Haley
11:46 Re: Memory model release/acquire mode interactions of relaxed atomic operations Toebs Douglass
11:20 Re: Memory model release/acquire mode interactions of relaxed atomic operations Jonathan Wakely
11:10 Re: -Wenum-compare and template metaprogramming Jonathan Wakely
09:35 Re: std::setlocale(...) return value ?? Papa
09:24 Re: Memory model release/acquire mode interactions of relaxed atomic operations Toebs Douglass
09:08 Re: Memory model release/acquire mode interactions of relaxed atomic operations Dietmar Schindler
08:36 Re: std::setlocale(...) return value ?? Liu Hao
08:33 std::setlocale(...) return value ?? Papa
06:33 Re: -Wenum-compare and template metaprogramming Xi Ruoyao
01:36 Re: Trouble building gcc 7 on mingw64 (can't find limits.h) Liu Hao
00:39 Trouble building gcc 7 on mingw64 (can't find limits.h) J.W. Jagersma

May 03, 2017
21:11 Re: g++ Locale ?? correction Papa
20:24 unrecognized command line option -fself-test J.W. Jagersma
16:29 Re: g++ Locale ?? correction Jonathan Wakely
16:27 Re: g++ Locale ?? correction Liu Hao
16:23 Re: g++ Locale ?? correction Jonathan Wakely
16:05 Re: g++ Locale ?? correction Papa
15:36 Re: g++ Locale ?? correction Jonathan Wakely
14:00 Re: g++ Locale ?? correction Papa
11:11 Re: Is the a GCC or GAS issue (or no issue at all)? Kyrill Tkachov
10:26 Re: -Wenum-compare and template metaprogramming Jonathan Wakely
09:38 Re: Is the a GCC or GAS issue (or no issue at all)? Richard Earnshaw (lists)
07:22 Re: g++ Locale ?? correction Liu Hao
07:17 Re: g++ Locale ?? correction Liu Hao
07:09 Re: g++ Locale ?? correction Xi Ruoyao
06:56 Re: Memory model release/acquire mode interactions of relaxed atomic operations Toebs Douglass
06:32 Re: g++ Locale ?? correction Liu Hao
06:30 Memory model release/acquire mode interactions of relaxed atomic operations Dietmar Schindler
06:12 Re: g++ Locale ?? correction Xi Ruoyao
05:32 Re: g++ Locale ?? correction Papa
04:41 -Wenum-compare and template metaprogramming Xi Ruoyao

May 02, 2017
19:04 Re: Binary compatibility between an old static libstdc++ and a new dynamic one Guilherme Quentel Melo
07:01 Re: Why does GCC store XMM registers into RAM then load them back instead of using them directly? Liu Hao
06:41 Re: Why does GCC store XMM registers into RAM then load them back instead of using them directly? Marc Glisse
06:16 Why does GCC store XMM registers into RAM then load them back instead of using them directly? Liu Hao
04:28 Re: g++ Locale ?? correction Xi Ruoyao
04:09 Re: g++ Locale ?? correction Papa
03:59 g++ Locale ?? Papa

May 01, 2017
12:42 Re: Windows build failure for gcc7 release candidates on 32-bit MinGW Jonathan Wakely
07:47 Re: Windows build failure for gcc7 release candidates on 32-bit MinGW niXman
02:13 Re: What is the proper protocol for submitting a bug report with a patch for a gcc V7 prerelease? Mikhail Maltsev
00:32 What is the proper protocol for submitting a bug report with a patch for a gcc V7 prerelease? David Gressett
00:14 RE: Windows build failure for gcc7 release candidates on 32-bit MinGW David Gressett


Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

Mail converted by MHonArc