This is the mail archive of the
gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Porting gcc without porting Binutils?
- From: htio2 <wenbin dot leong at gmail dot com>
- To: gcc-help at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2015 09:50:32 -0700 (MST)
- Subject: Re: Porting gcc without porting Binutils?
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <1444317733135-1192659 dot post at n5 dot nabble dot com> <CAK5mtewFF4BFzA+AZq8_Nxh_frj5vxSEJ6+WH1ZFXo9J-Sdnzw at mail dot gmail dot com> <1444320041182-1192676 dot post at n5 dot nabble dot com> <5616945B dot 7090002 at redhat dot com>
I could just use back some standard Binutils like arm's Binutils right ?
--
View this message in context: http://gcc.1065356.n5.nabble.com/Porting-gcc-without-porting-Binutils-tp1192659p1192698.html
Sent from the gcc - Help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.