This is the mail archive of the gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.
Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
August 31, 2015
| 13:09 | Re: Choosing the right -march target architecture | Tim Prince |
| 11:30 | Choosing the right -march target architecture | Mason |
August 30, 2015
| 03:50 | Re: [Consult] tile: How to construct testsuite for tile architecture without hardware. | Chen Gang |
August 28, 2015
| 15:30 | Re: 128-bit integer - nonsensical documentation? | Martin Sebor |
| 13:25 | Using profile guided optimization in shared library error | Victor Rodriguez |
| 13:07 | Salute. | Philip Li Wong |
| 08:41 | Re: Use BMI2 intrisic without enabling the BMI2 target for the whole translation unit | Ruben Laguna |
| 08:05 | Re: Function call inlining | Matwey V. Kornilov |
| 07:59 | Re: Function call inlining | Andrew Haley |
| 07:38 | GCC plugin question | Vanush Vaswani |
| 06:54 | Re: 128-bit integer - nonsensical documentation? | David Brown |
August 27, 2015
August 26, 2015
| 16:02 | Re: 128-bit integer - nonsensical documentation? | Martin Sebor |
| 12:51 | Re: 128-bit integer - nonsensical documentation? | Marc Glisse |
| 12:48 | Re: 128-bit integer - nonsensical documentation? | Jeffrey Walton |
| 12:47 | Re: 128-bit integer - nonsensical documentation? | David Brown |
| 12:47 | Re: 128-bit integer - nonsensical documentation? | Jeffrey Walton |
| 12:39 | Re: 128-bit integer - nonsensical documentation? | Jonathan Wakely |
| 12:32 | Re: 128-bit integer - nonsensical documentation? | Kostas Savvidis |
| 12:22 | Re: 128-bit integer - nonsensical documentation? | Jonathan Wakely |
| 12:13 | Re: 128-bit integer - nonsensical documentation? | David Brown |
| 11:44 | Re: 128-bit integer - nonsensical documentation? | Jeffrey Walton |
| 11:04 | 128-bit integer - nonsensical documentation? | Kostas Savvidis |
| 10:30 | Re: converting function pointers to/from object pointers | Josef Wolf |
| 02:13 | Re: Unexpected value-at for NULL'd pointer with pthreads | Kyle Harper |
August 25, 2015
| 23:42 | Re: parameter type of -frandom-seed | Martin Sebor |
| 18:15 | Re: ezmlm warning | Jonathan Wakely |
| 18:07 | Re: Error building gcc-5.* with threads=win32 | niXman |
| 18:03 | Re: ezmlm warning | Victor Rodriguez |
| 16:48 | parameter type of -frandom-seed | Stephan Gatzka |
August 24, 2015
August 23, 2015
| 21:10 | Re: reproducible build | Martin Sebor |
| 20:36 | Re: static functions appearing in the symbol table | Martin Sebor |
| 15:23 | Re: are statically allocated structs always aligned to a machine word on x86/x86_64? | Jonathan Wakely |
| 15:19 | Re: are statically allocated structs always aligned to a machine word on x86/x86_64? | Segher Boessenkool |
| 14:01 | Re: Gcc Error | Jonathan Wakely |
| 13:52 | Re: are statically allocated structs always aligned to a machine word on x86/x86_64? | Jonathan Wakely |
| 13:50 | reproducible build | Stephan Gatzka |
| 13:49 | Re: are statically allocated structs always aligned to a machine word on x86/x86_64? | Jonathan Wakely |
| 13:16 | static functions appearing in the symbol table | Martin Faltesek |
| 11:05 | Re: are statically allocated structs always aligned to a machine word on x86/x86_64? | Segher Boessenkool |
| 09:39 | Re: Error building gcc-5.* with threads=win32 | niXman |
| 00:07 | Re: Gcc Error | Thomas Dineen |
August 22, 2015
| 23:16 | Re: are statically allocated structs always aligned to a machine word on x86/x86_64? | Jonathan Wakely |
| 08:46 | Re: Gcc Error | Jonathan Wakely |
| 06:19 | Gcc Error | Thomas Dineen |
| 03:38 | Re: declare global in gimple | k9119911 |
| 02:21 | Re: declare global in gimple | Mikhail Maltsev |
August 21, 2015
August 19, 2015
August 18, 2015
| 20:58 | Re: Tail call optimization on function with many arguments | Jeff Law |
| 20:18 | Re: init_priority and initialization of POD types | Martin Sebor |
| 19:57 | Re: -finstrument-function -O2 and printf() instrumentation | Martin Sebor |
| 18:18 | Re: Question about GNU cpp -P | Martin Sebor |
| 17:30 | Tail call optimization on function with many arguments | Lionel Villard |
| 16:28 | Re: Where does C standard mention alignment requirements as written in gcc manual? | Segher Boessenkool |
| 16:25 | Re: Where does C standard mention alignment requirements as written in gcc manual? | Nicholas Mc Guire |
| 15:57 | Re: Where does C standard mention alignment requirements as written in gcc manual? | john smith |
| 15:50 | Re: Where does C standard mention alignment requirements as written in gcc manual? | Segher Boessenkool |
| 15:04 | Where does C standard mention alignment requirements as written in gcc manual? | john smith |
| 07:37 | problems with ltdl versions and building newer versions | L. A. Walsh |
August 17, 2015
| 14:03 | Re: Unable to compile GCC 5.2.0 on Debian 7 | Victor Rodriguez |
| 12:45 | -finstrument-function -O2 and printf() instrumentation | Stefan Ruppert |
| 09:08 | Let`s Get Ready for Another Week of Profits! | havrotinp |
August 16, 2015
| 17:26 | Re: Unable to compile GCC 5.2.0 on Debian 7 | Jonathan Wakely |
| 01:46 | Unable to compile GCC 5.2.0 on Debian 7 | admin |
| 01:20 | Re: Pointer parameter in function optimized out - incorrectly | Jeff Law |
August 15, 2015
| 20:43 | Question about GNU cpp -P | W. Michael Petullo |
| 20:33 | Re: Pointer parameter in function optimized out - incorrectly | Kalle Olavi Niemitalo |
| 20:08 | Re: Pointer parameter in function optimized out - incorrectly | Avi Kivity |
| 19:19 | Pointer parameter in function optimized out - incorrectly | James Kuyper |
August 14, 2015
| 15:13 | Re: Parentheses not honored when using FMA | Vincent Lefevre |
| 00:00 | Re: Method to specify initialization order across translation units? | Jeffrey Walton |
August 13, 2015
| 14:32 | Re: [wwwdocs] Re: C++ Concepts available in trunk? | Jonathan Wakely |
| 09:25 | Re: [wwwdocs] Re: C++ Concepts available in trunk? | Jonathan Wakely |
| 08:58 | [wwwdocs] Re: C++ Concepts available in trunk? | Jonathan Wakely |
| 08:05 | Re: Method to specify initialization order across translation units? | Jonathan Wakely |
August 12, 2015
August 11, 2015
| 23:03 | How to troubleshoot a crash under Cygwin at -O3? | Jeffrey Walton |
| 14:51 | Re: pthread_cancel and C++11 | Jonathan Wakely |
August 10, 2015
| 21:19 | Re: what options to pass to gcc for support of arm security extensions | Richard Earnshaw |
| 21:17 | Re: How to compile gcc with custom CFLAGS | Simon Wright |
| 20:05 | How to compile gcc with custom CFLAGS | Jan Sommer |
| 19:01 | pthread_cancel and C++11 | John Saxton |
| 16:25 | Linking problems on CentOS 4.9 | Michael Smith |
August 07, 2015
| 23:23 | Add codes in c-parser results in compilation error for gcc-4.7.2 | k9119911 |
| 08:36 | cilkplus vectorization problems | Marcin Krotkiewski |
August 06, 2015
| 16:49 | Re: Cross compiled gcc 4.9.3 fails with 'unrecognised emulation mode: -dynamic-linker' | Kai Ruottu |
| 14:45 | Re: Cross compiled gcc 4.9.3 fails with 'unrecognised emulation mode: -dynamic-linker' | Andrew Haley |
| 09:29 | Re: Cross compiled gcc 4.9.3 fails with 'unrecognised emulation mode: -dynamic-linker' | Fredrik Fornwall |
| 00:42 | RE: what options to pass to gcc for support of arm security extensions | Shahin Ansari |
August 05, 2015
| 20:55 | Re: Cross compiled gcc 4.9.3 fails with 'unrecognised emulation mode: -dynamic-linker' | Andrew Haley |
| 20:50 | Re: Method to specify initialization order across translation units? | Andrew Haley |
| 17:22 | Re: Explicit instantiation and static objects in different modules | Nikolay Vorobyov |
| 16:47 | Method to specify initialization order across translation units? | Jeffrey Walton |
August 04, 2015
| 21:57 | Cross compiled gcc 4.9.3 fails with 'unrecognised emulation mode: -dynamic-linker' | Fredrik Fornwall |
| 17:32 | Re: Explicit instantiation and static objects in different modules | Alexander Monakov |
| 17:06 | Re: Explicit instantiation and static objects in different modules | Jonathan Wakely |
| 16:53 | Re: Explicit instantiation and static objects in different modules | Alexander Monakov |
| 15:45 | Re: Explicit instantiation and static objects in different modules | Jonathan Wakely |
| 15:00 | Explicit instantiation and static objects in different modules | Nikolay Vorobyov |
| 14:34 | Re: GCC support for C++ noexcept | Edward Diener |
| 09:31 | Re: Error building gcc-5.* with threads=win32 | Jonathan Wakely |
| 09:28 | Re: Error building gcc-5.* with threads=win32 | Jonathan Wakely |
| 09:14 | Re: Details of new std::string | Jonathan Wakely |
| 02:35 | Details of new std::string | NightStrike |
August 03, 2015
| 18:42 | Re: Error building gcc-5.* with threads=win32 | niXman |
| 17:44 | Re: Union an alias when the difference is the volatile qualifier? | Jeffrey Walton |
| 17:39 | Re: Union an alias when the difference is the volatile qualifier? | Andrew Haley |
| 17:32 | Re: Union an alias when the difference is the volatile qualifier? | Jeffrey Walton |
| 15:51 | Re: Error building gcc-5.* with threads=win32 | Jonathan Wakely |
| 11:31 | Re: Error building gcc-5.* with threads=win32 | niXman |
| 07:42 | AW: How to build stand-alone (statically linked) gcc? | Warlich, Christof |
August 02, 2015
| 14:27 | Re: Union an alias when the difference is the volatile qualifier? | Andrew Haley |
| 11:41 | Re: A Question | Jeffrey Walton |
| 11:37 | Re: Error building gcc-5.* with threads=win32 | niXman |
| 11:14 | Union an alias when the difference is the volatile qualifier? | Jeffrey Walton |
August 01, 2015
| 12:45 | RE: what options to pass to gcc for support of arm security extensions | Sean Ansari |
| 12:42 | RE: A Question | Shahin Ansari |
| 08:32 | Error building gcc-5.* with threads=win32 | niXman |
Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]